22 Reasons Why Starting World War 3 In The Middle East Is A Really Bad Idea

While most of the country is obsessing over Miley Cyrus, the Obama administration is preparing a military attack against Syria which has the potential of starting World War 3. In fact, it is being reported that cruise missile strikes could begin "as early as Thursday". The Obama administration is pledging that the strikes will be "limited", but what happens when the Syrians fight back? What happens if they sink a U.S. naval vessel or they have agents start hitting targets inside the United States? Then we would have a full-blown war on our hands.

And what happens if the Syrians decide to retaliate by hitting Israel? If Syrian missiles start raining down on Tel Aviv, Israel will be extremely tempted to absolutely flatten Damascus, and they are more than capable of doing precisely that. And of course Hezbollah and Iran are not likely to just sit idly by as their close ally Syria is battered into oblivion. 

We are looking at a scenario where the entire Middle East could be set aflame, and that might only be just the beginning. Russia and China are sternly warning the U.S. government not to get involved in Syria, and by starting a war with Syria we will do an extraordinary amount of damage to our relationships with those two global superpowers. 

Could this be the beginning of a chain of events that could eventually lead to a massive global conflict with Russia and China on one side and the United States on the other? Of course it will not happen immediately, but I fear that what is happening now is setting the stage for some really bad things. The following are 22 reasons why starting World War 3 in the Middle East is a really bad idea...

#1 The American people are overwhelmingly against going to war with Syria...

Americans strongly oppose U.S. intervention in Syria's civil war and believe Washington should stay out of the conflict even if reports that Syria's government used deadly chemicals to attack civilians are confirmed, a Reuters/Ipsos poll says.

About 60 percent of Americans surveyed said the United States should not intervene in Syria's civil war, while just 9 percent thought President Barack Obama should act.

#2 At this point, a war in Syria is even more unpopular with the American people than Congress is.

#3 The Obama administration has not gotten approval to go to war with Syria from Congress as the U.S. Constitution requires.

#4 The United States does not have the approval of the United Nations to attack Syria and it is not going to be getting it.

#5 Syria has said that it will use "all means available" to defend itself if the United States attacks. Would that include terror attacks in the United States itself?

#6 Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Muallem made the following statement on Tuesday...

"We have two options: either to surrender, or to defend ourselves with the means at our disposal. The second choice is the best: we will defend ourselves"

#7 Russia has just sent their most advanced anti-ship missiles to Syria. What do you think would happen if images of sinking U.S. naval vessels were to come flashing across our television screens?

#8 When the United States attacks Syria, there is a very good chance that Syria will attack Israel. Just check out what one Syrian official said recently...

A member of the Syrian Ba'ath national council Halef al-Muftah, until recently the Syrian propaganda minister's aide, said on Monday that Damascus views Israel as "behind the aggression and therefore it will come under fire" should Syria be attacked by the United States.

In an interview for the American radio station Sawa in Arabic, President Bashar Assad's fellow party member said: "We have strategic weapons and we can retaliate. Essentially, the strategic weapons are aimed at Israel."

Al-Muftah stressed that the US's threats will not influence the Syrain regime and added that "If the US or Israel err through aggression and exploit the chemical issue, the region will go up in endless flames, affecting not only the area's security, but the world's."

#9 If Syria attacks Israel, the consequences could be absolutely catastrophic. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is promising that any attack will be responded to "forcefully"...

"We are not a party to this civil war in Syria but if we identify any attempt to attack us we will respond and we will respond forcefully"

#10 Hezbollah will likely do whatever it can to fight for the survival of the Assad regime. That could include striking targets inside both the United States and Israel.

#11 Iran's closest ally is Syria. Will Iran sit idly by as their closest ally is removed from the chessboard?

#12 Starting a war with Syria will cause significant damage to our relationship with Russia. On Tuesday, Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin said that the West is acting like a "monkey with a hand grenade".

#13 Starting a war with Syria will cause significant damage to our relationship with China. And what will happen if the Chinese decide to start dumping the massive amount of U.S. debt that it is holding? Interest rates would absolutely skyrocket and we would rapidly be facing a nightmare scenario.

#14 Dr. Jerome Corsi and Walid Shoebat have compiled some startling evidence that it was actually the Syrian rebels that the U.S. is supporting that were responsible for the chemical weapons attack that is being used as justification to go to war with Syria...

With the assistance of former PLO member and native Arabic-speaker Walid Shoebat, WND has assembled evidence from various Middle Eastern sources that cast doubt on Obama administration claims the Assad government is responsible for last week’s attack.

You can examine the evidence for yourself right here.

#15 As Pat Buchanan recently noted, it would have made absolutely no sense for the Assad regime to use chemical weapons on defenseless women and children. The only people who would benefit from such an attack would be the rebels...

The basic question that needs to be asked about this horrific attack on civilians, which appears to be gas related, is: Cui bono?

To whose benefit would the use of nerve gas on Syrian women and children redound? Certainly not Assad’s, as we can see from the furor and threats against him that the use of gas has produced.

The sole beneficiary of this apparent use of poison gas against civilians in rebel-held territory appears to be the rebels, who have long sought to have us come in and fight their war.

#16 If the Saudis really want to topple the Assad regime, they should do it themselves. They should not expect the United States to do their dirty work for them.

#17 A former commander of U.S. Central Command has said that a U.S. attack on Syria would result in "a full-throated, very, very serious war".

#18 A war in the Middle East will be bad for the financial markets. The Dow was down about 170 points today and concern about war with Syria was the primary reason.

#19 A war in the Middle East will cause the price of oil to go up. On Tuesday, the price of U.S. oil rose to about $109 a barrel.

#20 There is no way in the world that the U.S. government should be backing the Syrian rebels. As I discussed a few days ago, the rebels have pledged loyalty to al-Qaeda, they have beheaded numerous Christians and they have massacred entire Christian villages. If the U.S. government helps these lunatics take power in Syria it will be a complete and utter disaster.

#21 A lot of innocent civilians inside Syria will end up getting killed. Already, a lot of Syrians areexpressing concern about what "foreign intervention" will mean for them and their families...

"I've always been a supporter of foreign intervention, but now that it seems like a reality, I've been worrying that my family could be hurt or killed," said one woman, Zaina, who opposes Assad. "I'm afraid of a military strike now."

"The big fear is that they'll make the same mistakes they made in Libya and Iraq," said Ziyad, a man in his 50s. "They'll hit civilian targets, and then they'll cry that it was by mistake, but we'll get killed in the thousands."

#22 If the U.S. government insists on going to war with Syria without the approval of the American people, the U.S. Congress or the United Nations, we are going to lose a lot of friends and a lot of credibility around the globe. It truly is a sad day when Russia looks like "the good guys" and we look like "the bad guys".

What good could possibly come out of getting involved in Syria? As I wrote about the other day, the "rebels" that Obama is backing are rabidly anti-Christian, rabidly anti-Israel and rabidly anti-western. If they take control of Syria, that nation will be far more unstable and far more of a hotbed for terrorism than it is now.

And the downside of getting involved in Syria is absolutely enormous. Syria, Iran and Hezbollah all have agents inside this country, and if they decide to start blowing stuff up that will wake up the American people to the horror of war really quick. And by attacking Syria, the United States could cause a major regional war to erupt in the Middle East which could eventually lead to World War 3.

I don't know about you, but I think that starting World War 3 in the Middle East is a really bad idea. Let us hope that cooler heads prevail before things spin totally out of control.

Source: The Economic Collapse Blog via True Activist
http://www.whydontyoutrythis.com

Read More

Police break up 'drug-fueled orgy' at Masonic Lodge

Police in Michigan have broken up a shocking 'drug-fueled orgy' being hosted at a secretive Masonic Lodge - and this wasn't the first time it's happened, authorities warn.

Officers were called to the prominent building in downtown Battle Creek, Michigan - which sits across a park from police headquarters - about 2.15am Sunday. They found five women dancing on stage naked.

They also reportedly discovered a couple having sex in the lodge and several men standing around filming the action. 

WWMT-TV reports that authorities believe the Masonic Lodge, which is home of the secret society called Freemasons, has been used for such activities before and are working to shut the operation down.

Police sources told WWMT that officers found a 'drug-fueled sex party' in the building and sent the revelers home.

The Battle Creek Freemasons refused to comment on camera for the TV station, but insisted that the orgy was not part of the secret society's rituals. They said the party was not sponsored by their group at all.

Police raid 'drug fueled orgy' at Masonic Temple

Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2408655/Police-break-drug-fueled-orgy-Masonic-Lodge-finding-women-dancing-naked-stage-men-filming-sex-acts.html

Read More

John Kerry member of Skull and Bones Illuminati Exposed

Washington: When the Senate takes up whether to back White House plans to attack Syria, there may be few more effective or passionate lobbyists for the administration than Secretary of State John Kerry, who was a member of that exclusive club for 28 years.

Kerry last week described Syria’s suspected use of chemical weapons as “a moral obscenity” and, in a separate appearance, called Syrian President Bashar al-Assad “a thug and a murderer.

This liar is a Illuminati Skull and Bones member 

http://www.firstpost.com/world/john-kerry-emerges-as-point-man-in-obamas-push-to-punish-syria-1076763.html

In 2003, The Boston Globe ran a lengthy article detailing the newspaper's "discovery" that Senator John Kerry was not of Irish heritage, but, instead, was Jewish. In fact, insiders believe that Kerry's camp actually "planted" the story, it having been decided by the Illuminati that "it was time" for Kerry and a select, few other "Jews-in-hiding" to come out of the closet. -Texe Marrs

 

 

In 1965, John Kerry, Jewish son of a wealthy Wall Street family, the Kohns of New York and Boston, was "tapped" (i.e. chosen) for big things. Kerry was one of only 15 elite young men, all seniors at Yale University, initiated into the satanic secret society, Order of Skull & Bones.

 

 

Graduating from Yale in 1966, young Kerry was promptly recruited by the Central Intelligence Agency to be one of their chosen. His appointment to the spy agency was kept a guarded secret. In fact, the CIA has long been known as a harbor, or preserve, of the Bonesmen.

 

Kerry's Life Carefully Scheduled and Managed

 

 

Kerry's career and life path were selected for him by his Illuminati superiors. He has had his wives (yes-wives, plural) picked by them in arranged marriages. He was required by his superiors to enter the U.S. military and serve on a gunboat during the Vietnam conflict. Retired Naval officers seriously question whether Kerry really deserved the Silver Star and other decorations he was given for his brief stint in combat service. They believe he was given "Favorite Son" treatment.

 

The Illuminati's personnel directors carefully groomed young John Kerry from the start. First, they changed his family name to Kerry, from Kohn. Kohn, of course, shows Kerry's true heritage as a Jew. His superiors gave him a fictitious Irish name, great for political effect because Massachusetts has a strongly Irish population.

 

His full name, John Forbes Kerry, was chosen for him so his initials would be "JFK," to subconsiously implant in people's minds the Kennedy mystique.

 

 

Kerry also was instructed to join the Catholic Church, again a strong suit in the heavily Catholic state of Massachusetts.

 

Building on that, the young Illuminist trainee was sent off to prep schools in Europe, brought back to Yale to graduate from college, and given a valuable "gift," of "heroic military service." In fact, Kerry was a devout, pro-Communist anti-war protester while at Yale (before military service) and became active in the pro-Communist anti-Vietnam War movement immediately following his military discharge.

 

Kerry is a Communist

 

 

Covert CIA operative John Kerry joined with thousands of other pro-Mao Communists in an anti-U.S.A. demonstration in Washington, D.C. in April, 1971. Today, political insiders rank left-winger Senator Kerry as the "most liberal member" of the entire U.S. Senate. He has consistently voted for the gay agenda, for same sex marriages, for environmental surcharge taxes on gasoline, and for unbridled abortion. Kerry is also a promoter of a New World Order and for surrendering U.S. sovereignty to the U.N. and other international organizations.

 

 

The Heinz corporation, the majority of which is owned by Kerry's Jewish wife, Teresa, has located 55 of its 67 plants overseas, resulting in tens of thousands of Americans losing their jobs. Kerry not only supports job outsourcing but warmly embraces illegal immigration and welfare, medical and other benefits for illegals.

 

For almost two decades, John Kerry (John Kohn) has been a U.S. Senator, a post he was "awarded" by Democratic party politicians and did not merit. As a Senator, Kerry has never distinguished himself. Not even one significant piece of legislation has his name on it. What has Senator Kerry accomplished in the U.S. Senate these 19+ years?

 

A "Fireman" For The Illuminati

 

 

Kerry's major role as a Senator has been to slavishly serve the Illuminati by promoting its New World Order objectives. Often seen on TV as a talking head for liberal causes, inside the Senate, Kerry is known as the "Fireman." He quells and puts out the fires, suppressing controversies and scandals that arise from time to time which involve the CIA, the Illuminati, and its minions. When an Illuminati or CIA project is in jeopardy, or its personnel are in the dock, it's Fireman Kerry to the rescue!

 

Covering Up The BCCI Banking Scandal

 

 

The tall, liberal Democrat, U.S. Senator from Massachusetts, is considered a "publicity hound" by his Senate colleagues. However, having a penchant for getting one's face frequently on television does not a hero make. Although a junior Senator at the time, Kerry was "surprisingly" given the delicate job by his Senate colleagues in 1989 of looking into a slew of allegations that an international bank owned by the Illuminati named "BCCI" was heavily involved in racketeering, money laundering, bribery, terrorism, and a variety of other crimes.

 

When his Skull & Bones elders and their pals in the Senate, including Utah Republican Senator Orrin Hatch, told him to quietly put the lid on these unsavory allegations and to meekly absolve the bank of wrongdoing, Kerry, always quick to please, complied without a murmur.

 

Two years later, the lid blew off the BCCI case when the bank went under, filed bankruptcy, and left the taxpayers and unwitting investors holding the bag for some $500 million in losses.

 

The big boys of the Brotherhood, of course, had already cleared out their accounts, having received a few years advance notice from their front man and good buddy, Senator John Kerry. Then, in 1991, in a weird and surrealistic public relations ploy, the bonesman from New England suddenly announced that his Senate committee would reopen its hearings on the failed bank. Sorry, John, but the horses were already out of the barn. Indeed, shortly afterward, Kerry quietly closed shop on his committee's renewed "investigation."

 

The Tragic Case of the Missing POW/MIAs

 

 

The BCCI scandal is not the only shady deal in which John Kerry's tap dancing and coverup talents have come in handy for the Skull & Bones and other Illuminati hierarchy. When U.S. Senator Jesse Helms (R-NC) and a few others in Congress came out with revelations that some POW/MIAs may still be alive somewhere in Vietnam, the Bush, Sr. administration, embarrassed over accusations that its officials had sat on their hands and done little to resolve the POW/MIA issue, quickly called on fellow bonesman John Kerry. To the rescue he came, "boldly" announcing in front of the news cameras that his committee would launch a "full-scale investigation."

 

 

Kerry's assigned role, obviously, was to take the heat off the President and the Pentagon and to help the Illuminist Brotherhood in the process. Seems that the Brotherhood had a fond desire and longing to open up the oil and mineral-rich lands of Communist Vietnam and its neighbors, Cambodia and Laos, to commercial exploitation.

 

Senator Kerry and his committee quickly went into operation, actively debunking confirmed POW sightings in Vietnam and downplaying the POW/MIA issue. Then came the clincher: In late 1991 Senator Kerry personally flew to Vietnam on a "fact-finding" tour.

 

The upshot: the photogenic Kerry assured us (on television naturally!) that there were no more POWs being held and that there were no reliable accounts as to what had happened to the missing POW/MIAs. This, even though a Soviet KGB General had openly admitted that during the Vietnam war years, the KGB had callously shipped many of the American servicemen in bondage in Vietnam off to Soviet KGB prisons to be interrogated about their high-tech intelligence and military know-how.

 

At his news conference, once he had shunted aside the issue of missing POW/MIAs, John Kerry went right to the heart of this real purpose in volunteering his committee's time and energy to "resolve" the Vietnam POW/MIA issue. The bonesman Senator recommended that trade links, then prohibited, be immediately opened between the U.S. and Vietnam and that the U.S. diplomatically recognize the communist Saigon government as legitimate. That recognition, and acceptance by the U.S. of Vietnam as a trading partner, had been held up pending resolution of the case of the missing POW/MIAs.

 

Covering Up the Iran Contra Scandal

 

 

It was also Senator John Kerry, the Illuminati's Fireman, whose committee conducted hearings on the Iran Contra scandal. Kerry and company handled the matter with kid gloves and it was left to a special prosecutor, Lawrence Walsh, to try to get to the bottom of things and smoke out Oliver North, Caspar Weinberger, John Poindexter, Ronald Reagan, Richard Secord, and a host of other "buddies" involved in perpetrating and/or covering up the bribe paid to the treacherous and bloody Iranian ayatollahs as well as the treacherous Israeli government shenanigans.

 

John Kerry, unquestionably, has faithfully served the elite in tragically shafting our POWs/MIAs. He has covered up the Illuminati's financial crimes and helped the Israelis to hide their role in the Iran Contra affair. In doing so, he has repeatedly had to sell his soul to these Mafia bosses.

 

 

If elected President, John Kerry, shown here with fellow Massachusetts liberal, Ted Kennedy, will continue the Illuminati agenda.

 

 

A Moral Reprobate

 

 

The morally reprobate nature of Kerry was recently well-documented. Shortly after winning the Primary elections and being named the Democratic Party's de facto nominee for the White House, Kerry flew to Idaho for a weekend of snow skiing at a fancy resort. While skiing he was overheard berating a secret service agent assigned to protect him, calling him a "son of a bitch" simply because the agent accidentally got too close to him on the slopes.

 

 

At one of Kerry's campaign rallies, in Tampa, Florida, on March 16, 2004, Senator Kerry confronted a polite demonstrator, a Christian woman holding up a sign opposing abortion. The young woman, Rebecca Porter, had an abortion before she accepted Jesus as Saviour. Her sign read, "My Abortion Hurt Me."

 

 

So angry did this statement make Kerry, that the Senator immediately went over to several burly men, campaign aides (thugs?). They furiously went up to Rebecca and yanked the sign out of her hands. Then, they tore it to pieces as she and others looked on.

 

So much for free speech amongst the elite. Illuminati minions like Kerry do not give a flip whether abortion hurts a young woman like Rebecca Porter. They don't care a bit if millions of American families are hurt and must go hungry because parents can't find a job-because good U.S. jobs are being transferred to Red China, India, Pakistan, and Mexico.

 

Their God is Money

 

 

All these men care about is money and power. And, of course, serving their master, their god... the prince of darkness and king of the Illuminati elite.

Source:

http://rense.com/general53/ker.htm

Read More

AN F FOR MENTIONING JESUS

This is a picture posted online from a young girl who was given an F not because her written answer was grammatically bad but because she mentioned the name of Jesus Christ.



We have seen the infiltration of society by all kinds of groups but the group which no one seems to realize is Satanists or TARES that is what the bible calls and Jesus himself call’s them. These people can not stand the name of Jesus Christ it frightens disgusts and horrifies them. In the simple question give an example of how someone has impacted your life this girls choose Jesus Christ. She was given an F. 
The only reason for such a low mark was given.REMOVE JESUS (NAME ) PLEASE. 
Was the F also an abbreviation for a swear word?  We are all at war because the enemy is at the gate nothing happens in the physical before it happens in the real when Prayer was taken out of public schools a long time ago the school system shortly afterwards began to deteriorate rapidly. When people stopped praying families fell apart drugs destroyed whole communities and the Nations of the western world began to decline,  their money began its long trend towards loosing value through inflation we changed our money to a pure paper system an abomination in biblical terms which guaranteed remorseless and constant wars around the globe. 
Lucifer through this system is now in full control. The whole of society has been infiltrated and controlled by secret Satanists who hate The name of Jesus Christ. We need to wake up and Begin to use the name of Jesus every where we go in every conversation with every breath we take.

Jesus is the only way for Salvation and Waking Up. 
Jesus is Savior. 

6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

John 14:6 KJV

Source: http://countdowntozerotime.com/2013/08/21/an-f-for-mentioning-jesus-true-meaning-of-liberalism-a-breathing-living-hatred-for-god/

Read More

72 Types Of Americans That Are Considered “Potential Terrorists” In Official Government Documents

Are you a conservative, a libertarian, a Christian or a gun owner? Are you opposed to abortion, globalism, Communism, illegal immigration, the United Nations or the New World Order? Do you believe in conspiracy theories, do you believe that we are living in the “end times” or do you ever visit alternative news websites (such as this one)? If you answered yes to any of those questions, you are a “potential terrorist” according to official U.S. government documents. At one time, the term “terrorist” was used very narrowly. The government applied that label to people like Osama bin Laden and other Islamic jihadists. But now the Obama administration is removing all references to Islam from terror training materials, and instead the term “terrorist” is being applied to large groups of American citizens. And if you are a “terrorist”, that means that you have no rights and the government can treat you just like it treats the terrorists that are being held at Guantanamo Bay. So if you belong to a group of people that is now being referred to as “potential terrorists”, please don’t take it as a joke. The first step to persecuting any group of people is to demonize them. And right now large groups of peaceful, law-abiding citizens are being ruthlessly demonized.

Are you a conservative, a libertarian, a Christian or a gun owner?  Are you opposed to abortion, globalism, Communism, illegal immigration, the United Nations or the New World Order?  Do you believe in conspiracy theories, do you believe that we are living in the “end times” or do you ever visit alternative news websites (such as this one)?  If you answered yes to any of those questions, you are a “potential terrorist” according to official U.S. government documents.  At one time, the term “terrorist” was used very narrowly.  The government applied that label to people like Osama bin Laden and other Islamic jihadists.  But now the Obama administration is removing all references to Islam from terror training materials, and instead the term “terrorist” is being applied to large groups of American citizens.  And if you are a “terrorist”, that means that you have no rights and the government can treat you just like it treats the terrorists that are being held at Guantanamo Bay.  So if you belong to a group of people that is now being referred to as “potential terrorists”, please don’t take it as a joke.  The first step to persecuting any group of people is to demonize them.  And right now large groups of peaceful, law-abiding citizens are being ruthlessly demonized.

Below is a list of 72 types of Americans that are considered to be “extremists” and “potential terrorists” in official U.S. government documents.  To see the original source document for each point, just click on the link.  As you can see, this list covers most of the country…

1. Those that talk about “individual liberties”

2. Those that advocate for states’ rights

3. Those that want “to make the world a better place”

4. “The colonists who sought to free themselves from British rule”

5. Those that are interested in “defeating the Communists”

6. Those that believe “that the interests of one’s own nation areseparate from the interests of other nations or the common interest of all nations”

7. Anyone that holds a “political ideology that considers the state to be unnecessary, harmful,or undesirable”

8. Anyone that possesses an “intolerance toward other religions”

9. Those that “take action to fight against the exploitation of theenvironment and/or animals”

10. “Anti-Gay”

11. “Anti-Immigrant”

12. “Anti-Muslim”

13. “The Patriot Movement”

14. “Opposition to equal rights for gays and lesbians”

15. Members of the Family Research Council

16. Members of the American Family Association

17. Those that believe that Mexico, Canada and the United States “are secretly planning to merge into a European Union-like entity that will be known as the ‘North American Union’”

18. Members of the American Border Patrol/American Patrol

19. Members of the Federation for American Immigration Reform

20. Members of the Tennessee Freedom Coalition

21. Members of the Christian Action Network

22. Anyone that is “opposed to the New World Order”

23. Anyone that is engaged in “conspiracy theorizing”

24. Anyone that is opposed to Agenda 21

25. Anyone that is concerned about FEMA camps

26. Anyone that “fears impending gun control or weapons confiscations”

27. The militia movement

28. The sovereign citizen movement

29. Those that “don’t think they should have to pay taxes”

30. Anyone that “complains about bias”

31. Anyone that “believes in government conspiracies to the point of paranoia”

32. Anyone that “is frustrated with mainstream ideologies”

33. Anyone that “visits extremist websites/blogs”

34. Anyone that “establishes website/blog to display extremist views”

35. Anyone that “attends rallies for extremist causes”

36. Anyone that “exhibits extreme religious intolerance”

37. Anyone that “is personally connected with a grievance”

38. Anyone that “suddenly acquires weapons”

39. Anyone that “organizes protests inspired by extremist ideology”

40. “Militia or unorganized militia”

41. “General right-wing extremist”

42. Citizens that have “bumper stickers” that are patriotic or anti-U.N.

43. Those that refer to an “Army of God”

44. Those that are “fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation)”

45. Those that are “anti-global”

46. Those that are “suspicious of centralized federal authority”

47. Those that are “reverent of individual liberty”

48. Those that “believe in conspiracy theories”

49. Those that have “a belief that one’s personal and/or national ‘way of life’ is under attack”

50. Those that possess “a belief in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism”

51. Those that would “impose strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists)”

52. Those that would “insert religion into the political sphere”

53. Anyone that would “seek to politicize religion”

54. Those that have “supported political movements for autonomy”

55. Anyone that is “anti-abortion”

56. Anyone that is “anti-Catholic”

57. Anyone that is “anti-nuclear”

58. “Rightwing extremists”

59. “Returning veterans”

60. Those concerned about “illegal immigration”

61. Those that “believe in the right to bear arms”

62. Anyone that is engaged in “ammunition stockpiling”

63. Anyone that exhibits “fear of Communist regimes”

64. “Anti-abortion activists”

65. Those that are against illegal immigration

66. Those that talk about “the New World Order” in a “derogatory” manner

67. Those that have a negative view of the United Nations

68. Those that are opposed “to the collection of federal income taxes”

69. Those that supported former presidential candidates Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin and Bob Barr

70. Those that display the Gadsden Flag (“Don’t Tread On Me”)

71. Those that believe in “end times” prophecies

72. Evangelical Christians

Source: http://thetruthwins.com

Read More

1,000-Strong Mob Destroys North India Church, Attacks Members

Shouting religious slogans, a mob estimated at 1,000 people has destroyed a Christian church under construction in northern India, according to a report received from church leaders in the region. The attack occurred Sunday.

With the building demolished, the mob began to beat the pastor, his mother and church members, who were able to flee and went into hiding for the night. The extent of their injuries is not known. No deaths were reported.

“It is our desire that these who are persecuting will know the love of God for them,” said K.P. Yohannan, Gospel for Asia founder and president.

The Christian congregation had begun construction more than two years earlier, but quickly met resistance and had been forced to stop the work. After much prayer, the climate seemed to improve and construction resumed. Building had progressed uneventfully to the point that workers were ready to install the roof, when the attack came this week.

Earlier that afternoon, a small group from the community confronted the pastor and demanded that construction cease, saying the building was not wanted. Recognizing the growing tension, the pastor stopped the work.

Despite the pastor’s decision, the group rallied the villagers to a meeting and incited them to attack.

The day after the attack, regional leaders first prayed and then met with local police, who declined to become involved. Despite continuing threats, the leaders returned to the site to survey the damage and take photos.  

Church leaders have requested prayer from believers around the world that God will protect the pastor, his family and the congregation; heal the pastor’s son, whose medicine cannot be obtained in the current uneasy climate; and open the eyes of the villagers so they might experience the love of Jesus in their lives.

Those who wish to learn more about this event or make a donation can visit gfa.org/info/church-destroyed.

Source: http://www.charismanews.com/world/40822-1-000-strong-mob-destroys-north-india-church-attacks-members

Read More